Key data for Uganda

NCI24th HRCI21st HANCI25th
HANCI Africa compares 45 countries for their performance on 22 indicators of political commitment to reduce hunger and undernutrition. All the countries compared in the index have high rates of hunger and undernutrition. The comparative approach of the index means that country scores are calculated in relation to the political commitment of the other countries in the index.
Existing rates of: Stunting: 34.20% Wasting: 4.30% Proportion of population underweight: 12.00% Source: Gov. of Uganda (Uganda National Panel Survey, 2012)

Strong Performance

  • Government of Uganda has ensured tenure security for rural populations. Land titling is common and land markets function well. Policy promotes equitable access to common property resources.
  • The Government encourages varied agricultural research and extension services, and local farmer organisations are involved in setting policy priorities. The extension system is effective and properly reaches out to poor farmers. Government policies, strategies and mechanisms seek to ensure gender equity in access to extension services.
  • The National Nutrition Policy/Strategy identifies time bound nutrition targets and a multisectoral and multistakeholder policy coordination mechanism has been set up.
  • The Government has fully enshrined the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes into domestic law.
  • The Government of Uganda promotes complementary feeding practices.
  • In Uganda 93.3% of women aged 15-49 were visited at least once during pregnancy by skilled health personnel in 2011.
  • In Uganda, constitutional protection of the right to social security is strong.

Areas for improvement

  • Spending on agriculture (4.5% of public spending in 2014), does not meet government commitments set out in the African Union’s Maputo Declaration (10% of public spending).
  • Uganda’s spending in its health sector (11% of public spending in 2014) does not fully meet (15%) commitments set out in the Abuja Declaration.
  • In Uganda, the law does not give women economic rights equal to men. Men and women have equal legal access to agricultural land, but this is not effectively enforced and discriminatory practices against women continue, increasing their vulnerability to hunger and undernutrition.
  • Uganda does not have a separate budget line for nutrition; this prevents transparency and accountability for spending.
  • Policymakers in Uganda do not benefit from regular nutrition surveys that are statistically representative at national level. The last survey was published in 2011.
  • The Government of Uganda has only achieved two high doses of vitamin A supplementation for 66% of children in 2014.
  • Weak access to improved sanitation facilities (19.1% in 2015) obstructs better hunger and nutrition outcomes.
  • In Uganda, constitutional protection of the right to food is weak.
  • Social safety nets in Uganda are basic and only cover few risks for a limited number of beneficiaries.

Hunger Reduction Commitment Index (HRCI)

Public Spending Score Year HRCI rank of 45
Public spending on agriculture as share of total public spending
?
4.50%201425th
Public spending on health as share of total public spending
?
11%201419th
Policies Score Year HRCI rank of 45
Access to land (security of tenure)
?
Strong20142nd
Access to agricultural research and extension services
?
Strong201314th
Civil registration system — coverage of live births
?
29.9%201137th
Functioning of social protection systems
?
Weak201620th
Laws Score Year HRCI rank of 45
Level of constitutional protection of the right to food
?
Weak201131st
Equality of women’s access to agricultural land
?
In Law, not in Practice20141st
Equality of women’s economic rights
?
Not in Law201126th
Constitutional right to social security
?
Yes20111st

Nutrition Commitment Index (NCI)

Public Spending Score Year NCI rank of 45
Separate budget for nutrition
?
Sectoral only201529th
Policies Score Year NCI rank of 45
Vitamin A supplementation coverage for children
?
66.0%201429th
Government promotes complementary feeding
?
Yes20121st
Population with access to an improved water source
?
79.0%201519th
Population with access to improved sanitation
?
19.1%201536th
Health care visits for pregnant women
?
93.3%201120th
Nutrition features in national development policy
?
Moderate2015-202021st
National Nutrition Policy/Strategy
?
Yes20151st
Multisector and multistakeholder policy coordination
?
Yes20151st
Time bound nutrition targets
?
Yes20141st
National nutrition survey in last 3 years
?
No201135th
Laws Score Year NCI rank of 45
Enshrine ICBMS in domestic law
?
Fully enshrined20161st